|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
In his keynote address at the Ghana Report Summit, Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Dr George Akuffo Dampare rightly emphasized the necessity for the media to verify and cross-check information before publication. While the call for accuracy and caution in journalism is undeniably important, it’s crucial to scrutinize the broader implications of his administration’s approach to information dissemination.
Dr Dampare’s insistence on the media’s role in battling disinformation and misinformation is well-founded, considering these threats’ potential to undermine national security and societal cohesion. However, the police administration’s concurrent strategy to centralize and restrict access to information raises serious concerns.
The centralization of information, while aimed at controlling the spread of falsehoods, has inadvertently created a bottleneck that hampers transparency and public accountability. The increased difficulty in accessing information from the police administration, despite the IGP’s rhetoric on media verification, risks stifling essential public discourse and fostering a climate of secrecy.
This paradoxical approach suggests a troubling shift from proactive engagement to information control. The police administration’s efforts to manage disinformation should not come at the expense of an open and transparent flow of information. The public’s right to be informed and the media’s role in scrutinizing and reporting on governmental activities must not be overshadowed by an overzealous attempt to control narratives.
Dr. Dampare’s message is clear: misinformation is a severe threat that must be tackled with diligence. However, the manner in which his administration is handling information poses a significant risk of creating an environment where transparency is compromised. For true progress, there must be a balance—where the fight against falsehoods does not become an excuse for diminishing public access to vital information.
The IGP and his administration must reconsider their approach. Transparency and open access to information should be upheld as fundamental principles, even as efforts to combat misinformation are strengthened. It’s imperative that the pursuit of accuracy does not inadvertently lead to the suppression of information, for in the long run, both are essential to a healthy, democratic society.
SOURCE: EDITORIAL TEAM
Email Daily Mail GH: stories@dailymailgh.com or
Whatsapp: +233(0)509928122
